Messing v. Barr Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting “Defendants’ argu[ment] that the charging parties’ credibility is directly relevant and therefore, they should be able to inquire about falsification of identity and immigration status”
• immigration status not relevant where plaintiff was not seeking back pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).