Messick v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress because plaintiff had an existing form of recovery for emotional distress under civil rights statute
• no claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress because plaintiff had an existing form of recovery for emotional distress under civil rights statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).