Messer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was no evidence that the husband’s 1997 income would continue at the elevated level where there was testimony that overtime opportunities would no longer be available
• noting that mere knowledge that an offense is being committed is not the same as participation with criminal intent, and mere presence at the scene is not sufficient to establish participation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tharod Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-03· cited 5×
• Rudnick v. Harman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-30· cited 2×
• SAMUEL RANDALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-13
• State v. Garner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-16
• Menard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-16

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Staten v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-04· cited 110×
• State v. Espinosa
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-26· cited 42×
• Viveros v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-01· cited 34×
• Collins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-14· cited 29×
• K.O. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-15· cited 16×
• Stark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-07-18· cited 9×
• Sikes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-03· cited 5×
• Widner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-01· cited 5×