· 7/28/1953
Messenger v. United States
Citations
- 14 F.R.D. 515
- 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3895
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an employer did not have standing to challenge a subpoena duces tecum issued to and served upon one of its employees
- denying motion to compel compliance with subpoena that was invalid because of improper service
- “A motion to quash or modify a subpoena duces tecum may only be made by the party to whom the subpoena is directed except where the party seeking to challenge the subpoena has a personal right or privilege with respect to the subject matter requested in the subpoena.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruchhausen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.