Skip to main content
· 7/28/1953

Messenger v. United States

Citations

  • 14 F.R.D. 515
  • 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an employer did not have standing to challenge a subpoena duces tecum issued to and served upon one of its employees
  • denying motion to compel compliance with subpoena that was invalid because of improper service
  • “A motion to quash or modify a subpoena duces tecum may only be made by the party to whom the subpoena is directed except where the party seeking to challenge the subpoena has a personal right or privilege with respect to the subject matter requested in the subpoena.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruchhausen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.