Meskill & Columbia River Railway Co. v. Luedinghaus
Citations
- 78 Wash. 366
- 139 P. 52
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1026
Syllabus
<p>Eminent Domain — Damages—Evidence—Remoteness. In condemnation proceedings for a toll logging road through a narrow canyon leading to a body of timber, evidence of the value of the canyon based on the assumption that it was the most available outlet for the timber, is inadmissible as too remote and speculative, where the owners of the canyon did not own any of the timber, and it was not known when the timber would be logged or by what route the logs would be transported.</p>
Judges: Chadwick, Crow, Ellis, Main
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.