Mesiti v. Microdot, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The preferred means of [deciding whether postbankruptcy CERCLA claims are discharged] involves judicial application of a ‘foreseeability’ test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Signature Combs, Inc. v. United States
  W.D. Tennessee· 2003-03-19· cited 29×
• In Re Duplan Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1997-06-11· cited 10×
• Strata Resources v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-09-17· cited 7×
• Reynolds Bros. v. Texaco, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-04-14· cited 6×
• Strata Resources, a Texas Partnership Steven Bland Epps And Charles W. Brandes, Individually v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-07-11
• Muñiz Rivera v. Muñiz Hermanos, Inc.
  Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico· 1997-10-24