M.E.S., Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a claim for excess reproeurement costs under the ‘Termination for Default’ clause is different than one asserted under common law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named M.E.S., Inc. v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• M.E.S., Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-06-30· cited 3×