Mery v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “inferential treatment of the principle of consent did not adequately instruct the jury on a subject that was both vital to [defendant’s] defense and sufficiently supported by the evidence to make it a jury issue[ ]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).