Merwin Moskowitz v. Trustees of Purdue University and Purdue University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that post-retirement income and the cash value of fringe benefits are not recoverable under the ADEA
• indicating that the 1977 FLSA amendments “enlarge[d] the remedies ... beyond those standardly available for ... ADEA ... violations” when a plaintiff brings retaliation claims
• indicating that the 1977 FLSA amendments “enlarge[d] the remedies ... beyond those standardly available for ... ADEA ... violations” when a plaintiff brings retaliation claims
• stating that if plaintiff “knows or with the exercise of reasonable diligence would have known with each act that it was discriminatory and had harmed him, he may not sit back and accumulate all the discriminatory acts and sue on all within the statutory period applicable to the last one”
• “[D]amages [are] the standard ‘legal’ (as distinct from equitable) remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).