Skip to main content
· 3/28/1985

Mervyn's, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

Citations

  • 697 P.2d 690
  • 144 Ariz. 297
  • 1985 Ariz. LEXIS 187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that garnishment proceedings are considered quasi in rem and, thus, service by publication is sufficient to satisfy minimum due process requirements
  • finding “any procedure which deprives an individual of a property interest must satisfy due process”
  • “[A]ny procedure which deprives an individual of a property interest must satisfy due process.”
  • “It is beyond question that any procedure which deprives an individual of a property interest must satisfy due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.