Mervyn M. MERTZ, Appellee, v. JoAnn ROTT, Julie Rott Kessel, National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Company, Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that omission of exempt property is material even though the creditors are not affected by the omission
• holding that omission of exempt property is material even though the creditors are not affected by the omission
• holding that the bankruptcy court properly denied a debtor’s discharge where the debtor failed to disclose a state tax refund despite three separate chances to correct his schedules to account for this omission
• holding that where a debtor believes an 7 asset is exemptible, he cannot simply omit it from his schedule; rather, he must list the asset on his schedules and then claim the exemption
• denying discharge for knowing and fraudulent omission of entitlement to state tax refund of $1,358.00
• denying discharge for knowing and fraudulent omission of entitlement to state tax refund of $1,358.00

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).