Meru v. Huerta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conclusory motions or general no-evidence challenges to an opponent's case are not appropriate under rule 166a(i)
• holding that conclusory motions or general no-evidence challenges to an opponent's case are not appropriate under rule 166a(i)
• contract unenforceable where appellant was unable to establish exact amount of money owed to him pursuant to an oral bonus agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).