Skip to main content
· 5/4/2001

Mertz v. Pharmacists Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 625 N.W.2d 197
  • 261 Neb. 704
  • 2001 Neb. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that while which state’s law governs issue is question of law, determining state contacts involves factual inquiry
  • holding noncompete agreement was overly broad where it was not limited to clients with whom the former employee actually did business or personally contacted
  • holding noncompete agreement was overly broad where it was not limited to clients with whom the former employee actually did business or personally contacted
  • referring to whether restriction was limited to former employer’s clients with whom former employee had had personal contacts
  • discussing presumption created by application of sections dealing with specific types of contracts
  • “Iowa’s interest in protecting the expectations of the parties is outweighed by Nebraska’s strong public policy considerations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Stephan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.