Mertes v. Devitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that attorney who averaged less than two collection cases per year was not a debt collector
• finding that plaintiffs could not claim that the defendant was a “debt collector” when the “defendant averaged less than two collection matters per year ... [, which] comprised less than one percent of his practice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).