Supreme Court· 3/18/1882
Merritt v. Welsh
Citations
- 104 U.S. 694
- 26 L. Ed. 896
- 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2066
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that the artificial addition of color to sugar after manufacturing, and “especially after being put up in packages,” might constitute a “fraud on the revenue” because the sugar would have a different color from when it was manufactured
- a case involving the importation of sugar, which had been darkened with molasses during its manufacture to escape higher duties assigned to lighter-colored sugar
- “honest[ ] expos[ure]” of the goods to the customs officers may preclude a finding of fraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bradley, Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court· 1975-03-18· cited 241×
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 98×
- Waite v. MacYSupreme Court· 1918-04-22· cited 96×
- United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court· 1892-11-07· cited 64×
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-11-11· cited 47×
- Heartland By-Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 1999-10-19· cited 18×
- Flick's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFifth Circuit· 1948-04-16· cited 16×
- United States v. HannevigCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1920-04-13· cited 12×
- Tower & Sons v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1921-11-21· cited 12×
- United States v. International Forwarding Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1927-05-27· cited 10×
- Lansdown v. FarisEighth Circuit· 1933-07-07· cited 9×
- Heyliger v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1921-05-23· cited 8×
- Varsity Watch Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1947-03-25· cited 7×
- United Bulb Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1941-01-30· cited 7×
- Edmond v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-05-04· cited 5×
- United States v. GroggW.D. Virginia· 1925-12-12· cited 5×
- Wiley v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1966-04-04· cited 4×
- United States v. Baltimore Post Co.D. Maryland· 1924-12-16· cited 3×
- Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1965-12-13· cited 3×
- Park Avenue Imports v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1968-01-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.