Merritt v. Cameron
Citations
- 137 U.S. 542
- 11 S. Ct. 174
- 34 L. Ed. 772
- 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2117
Syllabus
<p>The ascertainment and liquidation of duties by a collector of customs, under Kev. Stat. § 2931, is the decision of that officer as to what the duties shall be, made after the measurement, weighing or gauging of the merchandise, its inspection and appraisal, the determination of its dutiable value, and.the taking of such other steps as the law may call for; and, so far from this being required to be delayed until the importer chooses to withdraw his goods for consumption, it may take place at any time after the original entry of the merchandise, and should follow, in the regular course of business, as soon after the entry as is convenient, just as in the case of merchandise entered for immediate consumption.</p> <p>Westray v. United States, 18 Wall. 322, explained.</p> <p>The ten days referred to in Rev. Stat. § 2931, within which an importer is allowed to protest against the liquidation of duties, begin to run upon their ascertainment and liquidation.</p> <p>A construction of a doubtful or ambiguous statute by the Executive Department charged with its execution, in order to be binding upon the courts, must be long continued and unbroken.</p>
Judges: Lamar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1929-01-02· cited 336×
- Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1901-04-15· cited 201×
- Deweese v. SmithEighth Circuit· 1901-02-25· cited 46×
- United States Trust Co. of New York v. AndersonSecond Circuit· 1933-06-12· cited 41×
- West v. BowenThird Circuit· 1989-06-30· cited 40×
- Hartman v. WarrenEighth Circuit· 1896-09-14· cited 25×
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1951-03-21· cited 23×
- Breswick & Co. v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1956-01-27· cited 21×
- Saltonstall v. RussellSupreme Court· 1894-04-09· cited 19×
- Gump Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1912-04-01· cited 19×
- Barnett v. WeinbergerD.C. Circuit· 1987-05-15· cited 17×
- B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1957-07-31· cited 17×
- Dart Export Corp. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1956-02-21· cited 15×
- Deming v. McClaughryEighth Circuit· 1902-02-10· cited 15×
- Barney v. RickardSupreme Court· 1895-04-01· cited 13×
- Nicholas v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1916-05-12· cited 11×
- Bertrose Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1923-11-17· cited 9×
- United States v. Mills & GibbCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1918-05-22· cited 8×
- Glover Construction Co. v. AndrusTenth Circuit· 1979-01-11· cited 6×
- De Pass v. BidwellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1903-08-14· cited 4×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.