Skip to main content
· 2/20/1985

Merritt Forbes & Co. v. Newman Investment Securities, Inc.

Citations

  • 604 F. Supp. 943
  • 225 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering copyrightability of a bond document, but denying summary judgment motion because originality is genuine issue of material fact, and explaining that “new elements” of a copied work are the only ones “pro- tected by copyright”
  • considering copyrightability of a bond document, but denying summary judgment motion because originality is genuine issue of material fact, and explaining that “new elements” of a copied work are the only ones “pro- tected by copyright”
  • noting public policy does not preclude bond underwriting documents from copyright protection
  • noting public policy does not preclude bond underwriting documents from copyright protection
  • “Originality may also be found in the selection and ordering of particular facts or elements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.