Skip to main content
· 4/18/1961

Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Bernice M. Frazier

Citations

  • 289 F.2d 849
  • 4 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 212
  • 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether a case should be reopened for new testimony is peculiarly a matter within the discretion of the trial judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens, Merrill, Koelsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.