Skip to main content
· 2/26/1999

Merritt-Campbell, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Rxp Products, Inc., Defendant-Counter Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross

Citations

  • 164 F.3d 957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he intent of the parties” is a fact question bearing on the existence of a contract; “whether[] the facts as found constitute a contract” presents a question of law
  • “While the quantity term in requirements contracts need not be numerically stated, there must be some writing which indicates that the quantity to be delivered under the contract is a party’s requirements or output.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Stewart, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.