Merrimack Mutual Fire Insu. Co. v. Dufault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing requirement to resolve disputed facts in non-moving parties’ favor
• recognizing requirement to resolve disputed facts in non-moving parties’ favor
• “district court was required to assume that any disputes of material fact-including conflicting opinions offered by competent experts—could be resolved by the jury in the Officers’ favor”
• “district court was required to assume that any disputes of material fact-including conflicting opinions offered by competent experts—could be resolved by the jury in the Officers’ favor”
• the First Circuit finding on appeal that at the district court, “the parties marshalled their evidence, mostly in the form of competing expert opinions concerning the reliability of the test, together with affidavits from the Officers denying drug use.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).