Merrimac Manufacturing Co. v. Bibb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that opportunity to review instructions two hours before charging conference and overnight constituted meaningful opportunity for review because counsel raised no concerns following day when queried by court
• concluding that opportu- nity to review instructions two hours before charging conference and over- night constituted meaningful opportunity for review because counsel raised no concerns following day when queried by court
• finding waiver when defense counsel merely indicated that there were no disagreements as to charge and \voiced no other exceptions or concerns\
• finding waiver when defense counsel merely indicated that there were no disagreements as to charge and ‘‘voiced no other exceptions or concerns’’
• ‘‘[i]n order to preserve an objection to a proposed jury instruction, the defendant must plainly put the trial court on notice as to the specific basis for his objection’’ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
• in rejecting defen- dant’s claim that he properly raised concern about jury instruction on conspiracy, this court noted that defense counsel expressed concern about definition of conspir- acy but not about instruction on intent elements of conspiracy charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).