Skip to main content
· 6/16/2006

Merrill v. MBNA America Bank, N.A. (In Re Merrill)

Citations

  • 343 B.R. 1
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1073
  • 2006 WL 1669758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “applying and enforcing the stay (and related provisions) is [not] a simple exercise where a bankruptcy judge’s experience and training are not required” (emphasis added)
  • “applying and enforcing the stay” is not “simple exercise where a bankruptcy judge’s experience and training are not required”
  • “[Ordering arbitration of [the debtor’s] stay violation claim would conflict with this court’s duty to safeguard the automatic stay’s fundamental protection for debtors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.