Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/5/1945

Merrill v. Fahs

Citations

  • 324 U.S. 308
  • 65 S. Ct. 655
  • 89 L. Ed. 963
  • 1945 U.S. LEXIS 2756
  • 1945 C.B. 418
  • 33 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the gift and estate taxes are in pari material and must be construed together
  • “‘The gift tax was supplementary to the estate tax. The two are in pari materia and must be construed together.’”
  • the gift and estate taxes are in pari materia and must be construed together
  • \But to interpret the same phrases in the two [laws] concerning the same subject matter in different ways where obvious reasons do not compel divergent treatment is to introduce another and needless complexity ....\
  • “The guiding light is . . . [that] ‘[t]he gift tax [i]s supplementary to the estate tax. The two are in pari materia and must be construed together.’” (quoting Estate of Sanford v. Commissioner, 308 U.S. at 44)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Frankfurter, Reed, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Merrill v. Fahs

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.