Skip to main content

Merrill v. Drazek

Citations

  • 374 N.E.2d 792
  • 58 Ill. App. 3d 455
  • 16 Ill. Dec. 17
  • 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 2330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because issues addressed by appellate and supreme court on appeal did not include damages, on remand to the trial court, the plaintiff was not precluded from amending complaint to state with specificity a damages claim
  • because issues addressed by appellate and supreme court on appeal did not include damages, on remand to the trial court, the plaintiff was not precluded from amending complaint to state with specificity a damages claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Merrill v. Drazek

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.