Skip to main content
· 9/16/1992

Merrill Lynch v. Eddings

Citations

  • 838 S.W.2d 874
  • 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 2512
  • 1992 WL 229126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding estoppel based on division orders could not permanently amend underlying lease
  • denial of motion was improper where no showing by opposing party that it was prejudiced by proponent's delay in seeking arbitration, even though proponent of arbitration initially invoked judicial process
  • denial of motion was improper where no showing by opposing party that it was prejudiced by proponent’s delay in seeking arbi tration, even though proponent of arbitration initially invoked judicial process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Cummings, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.