· 9/16/1992
Merrill Lynch v. Eddings
Citations
- 838 S.W.2d 874
- 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 2512
- 1992 WL 229126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding estoppel based on division orders could not permanently amend underlying lease
- denial of motion was improper where no showing by opposing party that it was prejudiced by proponent's delay in seeking arbitration, even though proponent of arbitration initially invoked judicial process
- denial of motion was improper where no showing by opposing party that it was prejudiced by proponent’s delay in seeking arbi tration, even though proponent of arbitration initially invoked judicial process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Cummings, Vance
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.