Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Wertz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is, at times, “impossible to calculate the investments that would have flowed from [those] customers’ accounts”
• “[T]he Court believes the public interest is served by protecting confidential business information and trade secrets, and enforcing valid contractual provisions, to which parties have voluntarily entered.”
• “[T]he Court believes the public interest is served by protecting confidential business information and trade secrets, and enforcing valid contractual provisions, to which parties have voluntarily entered.”
• “[T]he Court does not believe that a temporary restraining order preventing the [] defendants . . . from engaging in conduct that they specifically agreed to avoid when they signed their employment agreements does not cause substantial injury to them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).