Merrill Lynch & Co. v. Mathes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mailing a statement of claim to the New York office of the NYSE and obtaining a New York attorney were insufficient to constitute purposeful activity in New York

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Koob v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-07-13· cited 45×
• Ann F. Cogswell, F/k/a Ann F. Stanton v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. Ben D. Trevor
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-02-23· cited 37×
• CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC v. Hilliard
  S.D. New York· 2007-01-03· cited 7×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. McLeod
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-02-23· cited 14×
• Painewebber Inc. v. McAdams
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-02-23· cited 3×