· 3/23/1992
Merrill E. Fields v. Attorney General of the State of Maryland Kenneth E. Taylor, Warden
Citations
- 956 F.2d 1290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that petitioner arguably demonstrated a conflict when his interests diverged from his lawyer’s “interest in protecting his own professional reputation and good-standing”
- noting that petitioner arguably demonstrated a conflict when his interests diverged from his lawyer's \interest in protecting his own professional reputation and goodstanding\
- noting that petitioner arguably dem- onstrated a conflict when his interests diverged from his lawyer's \in- terest in protecting his own professional reputation and good- standing\
- affirming denial of habeas petition on grounds other than those relied upon by district court
- “Absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, a defendant is bound by the representations he makes under oath during a plea colloquy.”
- “Absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, a defendant is bound by the representations he makes under oath during a plea colloquy”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Powell, Wilkinson, Ellis, Eastern, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.