Skip to main content
· 3/23/1992

Merrill E. Fields v. Attorney General of the State of Maryland Kenneth E. Taylor, Warden

Citations

  • 956 F.2d 1290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that petitioner arguably demonstrated a conflict when his interests diverged from his lawyer’s “interest in protecting his own professional reputation and good-standing”
  • noting that petitioner arguably demonstrated a conflict when his interests diverged from his lawyer's \interest in protecting his own professional reputation and goodstanding\
  • noting that petitioner arguably dem- onstrated a conflict when his interests diverged from his lawyer's \in- terest in protecting his own professional reputation and good- standing\
  • affirming denial of habeas petition on grounds other than those relied upon by district court
  • “Absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, a defendant is bound by the representations he makes under oath during a plea colloquy.”
  • “Absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, a defendant is bound by the representations he makes under oath during a plea colloquy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powell, Wilkinson, Ellis, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.