Merrick v. Appenzeller
Citations
- 115 Wash. 181
- 196 P. 629
- 1921 Wash. LEXIS 696
Syllabus
<p>Husband and Wife (20)—Separate Property of Wife-—Evidence ■—Sufficiency. The presumption that property acquired by the wife during marriage is community property is overcome by evidence showing she had several thousand dollars before marriage, that she acquired three thousand more by inheritance and insurance proceeds; that she invested this money in business and purchased real estate from the profits of the business; and that the property which it is sought to subject to community debts was paid for by 'trading in her separate realty and by application of her separate funds derived from gift, inheritance and insurance.</p>
Judges: Holcomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court· 1986-02-11· cited 139×
- Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court· 1923-04-05· cited 53×
- Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court· 1923-09-20· cited 45×
- Northwest Lumber Co. v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court· 1924-05-19· cited 35×
- Morton v. WooleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1922-06-27· cited 19×
- Community State Bank v. DayWashington Supreme Court· 1923-10-18· cited 8×
- Hitt Fireworks Co. v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court· 1922-09-18· cited 7×
- Payne Bros. v. BurnettTennessee Supreme Court· 1924-09-15· cited 6×
- Anderson v. Farmers State BankWashington Supreme Court· 1924-06-24· cited 2×
- State v. BanksNevada Supreme Court· 1935-07-10
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.