· 9/9/1994
Merriam-Webster, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Random House, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Citations
- 35 F.3d 65
- 32 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1010
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The conspicuous use of very different logos and of the names of the publishers significantly distinguishes the two trade dresses.”
- “The lack of survey evidence counts against finding actual confusion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meskill, Winter, Pratt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.