Skip to main content
· 9/9/1994

Merriam-Webster, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Random House, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 35 F.3d 65
  • 32 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1010
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The conspicuous use of very different logos and of the names of the publishers significantly distinguishes the two trade dresses.”
  • “The lack of survey evidence counts against finding actual confusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Winter, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.