Merrell v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the court in applying the Monsanto standard held that termination may be justified in order to avoid losing a disgruntled customer
• named plaintiff must have suffered the same type injury of those he purports to represent
• named plaintiff must. have suffered the same type injury of those he purports to represent
• where the court in applying the Monsanto standard held that termination may be justified in order to avoid losing a disgruntled customer
• no anticompetitive agreement could be inferred where manufacturer and distributor pursued different goals
• “In light of Falcon, general statistical evidence of underrepresentation in the workforce will undoubtedly not suffice to justify a single class covering different types of discrimination such as in hiring, promotion, and discharge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).