Mermell v. McKinley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Legislative Data Processing Center’s acceptance of the complete 2010 census data package as “usable” triggered, in that case, “the ninety-day period for filing a preliminary redistricting plan”
• recognizing difficulty in LRC’s task, “not only because of the political and local interests that are affected by any change in the existing scheme, but also because accommodating one [constitutional] command can make accomplishing another command more difficult.”
• involving an appeal of the Commission’s 2012 Plan that was filed within the 30-day requirement of Article II, Section 17(d)
• acknowledging that redistricting has an “inevitably legislative” component
• providing prospective guidance for remand to commission in direct review capacity
• providing prospective guidance for remand to commission in direct review capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).