Merlin v. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a client’s notes were protected by the attorney-client privilege because they were prepared for and transmitted to the attorney either in contemplation of or during the litigation
• explaining that when a witness refers to documents to refresh his memory while testifying, the adverse party is entitled to inspect the documents and to cross-examine the witness about them
• court has discretion as to production of notes used to refresh a witness’ or a party's memory other than while actually being deposed or testifying

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).