Merle W. Dameron v. Washington Magazine, Inc. Merle W. Dameron v. Washington Magazine, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \nothing in the article gives the reader any reason to believe that the allegedly defamatory statement is intended as a summaty of a[ ] [report]\
• holding that an article’s reliance of a report did not qualify for the privilege because “[t]he challenged assertion is simply offered as historical fact without any indication of its source”
• finding that fatal airplane crash and ensuing investigation into its causes created a public controversy
• discussing \the common law rule that one who repeats or republishes a defamation uttered by another 'adopts' it as his own\
• finding an air traffic controller was an involuntary public figure because he happened to be on duty when a plane crash occurred
• reports unfair and inaccurate where “garbled or fragmentary to the point where a false imputation is made about the plaintiff which would not be present had a full and accurate report been made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).