Merle L. Hibbs, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. K-Mart Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that both Rule 54(d) and § 1920 are “phrased in permissive terms.”
• holding that landlord was not third-party beneficiary of sublease between developer and sublessee simply because contracting parties knew that owner would profit from sublease because monies derived by developer could be used to pay ground lease with owner
• discussing discretionary nature of cost award under Rule 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1920
• discussing discretionary nature of cost award under Rule 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1920
• discussing discretionary nature of cost award under Rule 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1920
• noting language of Rule 54(d) is permissive, not mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).