Merla J. Mullenberg v. United States of America, Department of Health & Human Services, and Dr. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses “do not trigger Tucker Act jurisdiction in the courts”
• holding that the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments “do not trigger Tucker Act jurisdiction in the courts”
• holding that the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments \do not trigger Tucker Act jurisdiction in the courts\
• holding that the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution does “not trigger Tucker Act jurisdiction in the courts”
• holding that the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses “do not trigger Tucker Act jurisdiction in the courts”
• holding that the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments “do not trigger Tucker Act jurisdiction in the courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).