Meritage Homes of Nevada, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that Nevada has no caselaw on the statutes governing joint debtor proceedings
• commenting that Nevada has no caselaw on the statutes governing joint debtor proceedings
• “counsel for Meritage flatly asserted that Meritage 'do[es] not claim that we had a security interest.’ ” (alteration in original)
• “In general . . . it is a principle of statutory construction that the ‘word “may,” when used in a statute, usually implies some degree of discretion.’”
• “In general . . . it is a principle of statutory construction that the ‘word “may,” when used in a statute, usually implies some degree of discretion.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).