Merit Tat International, Ltd. v. Wynnchurch Capital Partners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Section 1332(a)(3)] does not apply, because . . . [the plaintiff] Merit Tat is a citizen of a foreign state, but it is not an ‘additional part[y],’ since it is the only plaintiff in the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).