Merill v. Alaska Bar Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on defendants’ statements of material facts not an abuse of discretion where the pro se plaintiff did not comply with local rules
• affirming application of Local Rule 56.1 to a pro se litigant to deem the defendant’s facts as admitted
• affirming application of Local Rule 56.1 to a pro se litigant to deem the defendant’s facts as admitted
• finding no extreme or outrageous conduct in an improper eviction where the defendants had at least consulted with an attorney “about how to handle the situation.”
• Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by federal actors, or by state actors through the Fourteenth Amendment
• “Neither appellate courts nor district courts are obliged in our adversary system to scour the record looking for factual disputes.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).