Skip to main content
· 2/27/1959

Merickel v. Erickson Stores Corporation

Citations

  • 255 Minn. 12
  • 95 N.W.2d 303
  • 1959 Minn. LEXIS 563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that rescission \by [m]utual agreement of a single provision of a contract is a modification or an amendment without a cancellation or a voidance of the contract as a whole\
  • finding that rescission “by [m]utual agreement of a single provision of a contract is a modification or an amendment without a cancellation or a voidance of the contract as a whole”
  • involving a claim that the parties had modified a written construction contract to change the dimensions of a building while under construction
  • involving a claim that the parties had modified a written construction contract to change the dimensions of a building while under construction
  • any abandonment of a contract by mutual agreement is in the nature of a rescission
  • “A rescission — or so-called abandonment — by mutual agreement of a single provision of a contract is a modification or an amendment without a cancellation or a voidance of the contract as a whole.” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.