Mereish v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that stray comments regarding generational change were insufficient evidence of pretext in ADEA claim
• holding that “general or ambiguous remarks referring to the process of generational change create no triable issue of age discrimination”
• holding that \general or ambiguous remarks referring to the process of generational change create no triable issue of age discrimination\
• holding that stray comments regarding generational change were insufficient evidence of pretext in ADEA claim
• holding that plaintiffs failed to show pretext despite documented evidence of the employer’s desire to protect the “young, bright, junior” employees and the employer’s expressed concern with the aging workforce
• stating that “strategic business decision[s] constitute[ ] a legally sufficient justification for ... termination,” and specifically noting that addressing “adverse financial conditions” is a legitimate reason for termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).