Skip to main content
· 9/8/1987

Meredith v. Talbot County, Maryland

Citations

  • 828 F.2d 228
  • 18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21390
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “procedures, programs, statutes, regulations, planning boards, and officials involved in the subdivision approval process qualify zoning in Talbot County, Maryland, as being governed by a complex state regulatory scheme”
  • \The underlying purpose of Burford abstention is to enable federal courts to avoid needless conflict with the administration by a state of its own affairs.\
  • \Pullman absten- tion . . . is appropriate where there are unsettled questions of state law that may dispose of the case and avoid the need for deciding the con- stitutional question.\
  • “[S]everal levels of state review of zoning decisions exist, including: (1) an appeal from the Talbot County Planning Commission to the County Board of Appeals; (2) an appeal from the County Board of Appeals to the Circuit Court for Talbot County; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.