Meredith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Nalls made it “loud and clear that a contemporaneous objection in the trial 18 court is a necessary predicate for appellate review” of a “trial court’s compliance with Rule 4–246(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clark v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-07-31· cited 10×
• Hammond v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-02-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nalls & Melvin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-04-23· cited 44×
• Valonis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-20· cited 23×