· 2/27/2003
Meredith v. Oregon
Citations
- 321 F.3d 807
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1670
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2179
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3564
- 2003 WL 549362
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that protecting residents’ safety is an important state interest
- “[A]ppellate courts may review rulings that are ‘inextricably intertwined’ with or ‘necessary to ensure meaningful review of’ decisions over which we have jurisdiction.” (quoting Swint v. Chambers Cty. Comm’n, 514 U.S. 35, 51 (1995))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Thompson, Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.