Skip to main content
· 2/27/2003

Meredith v. Oregon

Citations

  • 321 F.3d 807
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1670
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2179
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3564
  • 2003 WL 549362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that protecting residents’ safety is an important state interest
  • “[A]ppellate courts may review rulings that are ‘inextricably intertwined’ with or ‘necessary to ensure meaningful review of’ decisions over which we have jurisdiction.” (quoting Swint v. Chambers Cty. Comm’n, 514 U.S. 35, 51 (1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Thompson, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.