Meredith v. Keisling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that BLM’s issuance of grazing permits constituted final agency action despite lack of alteration of BLM’s legal regime
• holding that BLM’s issuance of grazing permits constituted final agency action despite lack of alteration of BLM’s legal regime
• holding that “the fact that an agency decision is not final under the APA is not a defect in subject matter jurisdiction” (footnote omitted)
• approving the balance struck by the district court where the court “was mindful of the equities on all sides”
• agency required to “conduct environment studies required by law [to] properly determine . . . what measures should be implemented permanently”
• affirming injunction requiring reprocessing of 68 permits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).