Mercury Ins. Co. of Florida v. Moreta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “opposing counsel’s criticism of Mercury’s alleged litigation tactics and practices was not based on matters in evidence”
• finding improper defense counsel’s closing argument revealing opinion of non-testifying witness
• “[O]pposing counsel’s criticism of [insurer]’s alleged litigation tactics and practices was not based on matters in evidence. . . . Because there was no evidence before the trial court to support these claims, it was improper for counsel to make them.”
• motion for new trial based on unobjected-to closing arguments preserved issue for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).