Merckle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for trial court to reduce $1000 fine by $500 because it exceeded the statutory maximum fine of $500 for the offense
• rejecting the contention that circumstantial evidence was legally insufficient and not inconsistent with reasonable hypothesis of innocence, and affirming convictions for bribery, receiving unlawful compensation, and extortion by a state officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Merckle v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-06-09· cited 8×
• State v. Castillo
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-04-22· cited 5×
• Merckle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-12· cited 3×
• State v. Gerren
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-08· cited 2×
• Gonse v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-26· cited 1×
• State v. Merckle
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-02-15

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tibbs v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
• Tibbs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-09· cited 432×
• Albritton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 397×
• Lynch v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
• State v. Mischler
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-03· cited 241×
• Scurry v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-05· cited 114×
• In re Rules of Criminal Procedure
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-08· cited 79×
• Clark v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-11-21· cited 65×
• Tsavaris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-07· cited 14×
• Dixon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-03· cited 11×
• Garrett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-15· cited 5×
• Hope v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-15· cited 4×