Merchants' National Bank v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the decisionmaker’s knowledge of the protected activity is ‘essential to a retaliation claim’” (quoting Francisco v. Verizon S. Inc., 756 F. Supp.2d 705, 725-26 (E.D. Va. 2010))
• explaining that “the decisionmaker’s knowledge of the protected activity is ‘essential to a retaliation claim’” (quoting Francisco v. Verizon S. Inc., 756 F. Supp. 2d 705, 725-26 (E.D. Va. 2010))
• dismissing retaliation claim where plaintiff failed to “articulate who was the ‘decisionmaker’ responsible for his termination and [did] not allege that the responsible individual even knew of the EEOC charge”
• “The elements of an ADA retaliation claim mirror the elements of Title VII retaliation claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).