Mercer v. Rosenblath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prisoners up for parole received adequate process when given opportunity to be heard and provided reasons for denial of parole
• holding that prisoners up for parole received adequate process when given opportunity to be heard and provided reasons for denial of pa- role
• holding that prisoners up for parole received adequate process when given opportunity to be heard and provided reasons for denial of pa- role
• holding that prisoners up for parole received adequate process when given opportunity to be heard and provided reasons for denial of pa- role
• holding that “a ‘mere 28 error of state law’ is not a denial of due process”
• holding that “a ‘mere error of state law’ is not a denial of due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).