Mercantile Ins. v. Holthaus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parts and repairs for excavating machinery were not lienable because they were not consumed within the improvement, but merely became part of the contractor’s personal property
• holding that parts and repairs for excavating machinery were not lienable because they were not consumed within the improvement, but merely became part of the contractor's personal property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).